Alice Felts et al. v. Pamela Thaxton

Automated case summary

What the court decided

The legal issue involved whether Alice Felts could prove undue influence in setting aside an annuity beneficiary designation based on circumstantial evidence of a relationship with David Silvian. The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part, holding that the trial court correctly granted the directed verdict because the evidence was insufficient to establish undue influence.