Georgia Court of Appeals
City Of Atlanta v. Jonathan Querisma
Automated case summary
What the court decided
The legal issue involved whether the City of Atlanta was immune from liability under the Recreational Property Act despite Querisma entering the park without a charge. The Georgia Court of Appeals held that because the statute allows immunity if an individual is charged for recreational use and injured in connection with it, the City's motion for summary judgment was AFFIRMED.
The daily digest
Researching a Georgia appeal? Keep up with the next decisions, too.
Get covered Georgia civil appellate decisions in one court-business-day email, with concise automated summaries, docket details, dispositions, and links to the official opinions.
$5/month or $39/year
The public case library remains free. Summaries are automated and not individually reviewed; consult the official opinions before relying on them.